Realists. Idealists have ideas that seem very nice, but most of the time cannot act on them. It is the realists who get things done. I look at it almost as liberals vs conservatives. Its really nice to imagine a world where all was equal,wealth evenly divided etc. however its never going to happen. Wasting time trying to pass legislation on that is just that - a waste of time. Dealing with real issues that can actually be dealt with are that much more important.
Like all standardized argument or policy based questions, the conclusion is irrelevant. The purpose of the question is for the argument and analysis as there is no definitive answer.
Parenthetically, the answer is neither. People, either idealist or realists, who seize opportunities and work towards the betterment of society, are the greatest contributors to society.
Realists can also be pessimistic, far more so than idealists. Idealists aren't necessarily inactive, they just sometimes shoot too high.
I think that idealists, with a realistic application, but always striving for more, contribute the most. If you're grounded entirely in reality, you often can't see behind the horizon, and all you do is continue the status quo without ever making an attempt to make things better.
Transcending a reality mired in unproductive wheel spinning in the mud is best envisioned and executed by idealists.
My thought process paralled that of Shades. Idealists see beyond the moment and dream of a greater future. I feel that realists are more complacent of the world they live in.
That being said, SiBaW is right. It really depends on who has the focus and directive to make real changes. being and idealist is great in theory but if nothing ever comes of it, then all those thoughts are meaningless.
I'd say idealists are greater contributors to society because they are going to be the ones who think outside the box and will travel on roads not taken. They'll do things no one else thought of and take risks when people think they're nuts for doing it...and at a certain point they will end up seeing results.
Realists will end with "it's not possible so I wont even try" while idealists will aim for things beyond their grasp...and eventually they'll get somewhere.
It's reminds me of the quote, "Shoot for the moon, even if you miss, you will still land among the stars."
my love how many letters have i written you that i dont know if u have read how many have i composed in my head, how many tears i shed thinking of you missing you wow, its been 4 years almost, and yet your still the first person i think of when things are hard and i need comfort, seeing you the other night and you basically ignoring me the whole night i tried loving someone else, i really tried but i cant because u took my heart and never gave it back, that shabbat, we had just met a few weeks earlier, you took my arm and told me you were never going to let go and that you never felt so safe, that moment lives with me always because you did let go, and i have not been able to. there is something about you that i cant explain, i always want to be with you, i always want to hear your voice i am forever linked to you as much as i want to deny it. yet, your cold, detached but i love you and everything is so messed up, and i just want to go back to that shabbat when u climb...
I don't usually write about anything Shidduch related. But I saw this today and it really captures how I view shidduchim. People have their theories and opinions about how and why and what. If i get my nose done, go to singles events, make more contacts, anything, then maybe I'll get married sooner. Compromise more. Maybe we need more incentives for shadchanim? My theory. G-d runs the world. He makes Shidduchim. G-d has no crisis. The end.
What's the question, either one or the other? Or any in general?
ReplyDeleteGreater than what, everyone else?
Being an idealist or a realist is a personal choice and mainly affects oneself, so I don't see how society would gain from it in any way.
Which kind of person makes more contributions? Helps society more?
ReplyDeleteRealists. Idealists have ideas that seem very nice, but most of the time cannot act on them. It is the realists who get things done. I look at it almost as liberals vs conservatives. Its really nice to imagine a world where all was equal,wealth evenly divided etc. however its never going to happen. Wasting time trying to pass legislation on that is just that - a waste of time. Dealing with real issues that can actually be dealt with are that much more important.
ReplyDeleteLike all standardized argument or policy based questions, the conclusion is irrelevant. The purpose of the question is for the argument and analysis as there is no definitive answer.
ReplyDeleteParenthetically, the answer is neither. People, either idealist or realists, who seize opportunities and work towards the betterment of society, are the greatest contributors to society.
Realists can also be pessimistic, far more so than idealists. Idealists aren't necessarily inactive, they just sometimes shoot too high.
ReplyDeleteI think that idealists, with a realistic application, but always striving for more, contribute the most. If you're grounded entirely in reality, you often can't see behind the horizon, and all you do is continue the status quo without ever making an attempt to make things better.
Transcending a reality mired in unproductive wheel spinning in the mud is best envisioned and executed by idealists.
My thought process paralled that of Shades. Idealists see beyond the moment and dream of a greater future. I feel that realists are more complacent of the world they live in.
ReplyDeleteThat being said, SiBaW is right. It really depends on who has the focus and directive to make real changes. being and idealist is great in theory but if nothing ever comes of it, then all those thoughts are meaningless.
I'd say idealists are greater contributors to society because they are going to be the ones who think outside the box and will travel on roads not taken. They'll do things no one else thought of and take risks when people think they're nuts for doing it...and at a certain point they will end up seeing results.
ReplyDeleteRealists will end with "it's not possible so I wont even try" while idealists will aim for things beyond their grasp...and eventually they'll get somewhere.
It's reminds me of the quote, "Shoot for the moon, even if you miss, you will still land among the stars."
@SiBaW: LOL!! Happens to be I was thinking the same thing as you, but you phrased that so well I still laughed!
ReplyDeleteThat being said, I like what Devorah said :)